Python, JavaScript, Haskell updated

Python changes

• BREAKING DESCRIPTION CHANGE: changed spec to INCLUDE 2**31-1, was previously maximum 2**31-2 which is WEIRD and probably unintentional
• added missing fixed test for 0 as per spec, added 2**31-1 as per NEW spec
• added 1 10 100 1000 and 9 99 999 .. in case someone's got an off-by-one somehow
• picks 10 of each possible length and rolls within that range instead of just randrange(2**31) which is going to pick the same number of digits 90% of the time

(I've got the same thing but in haskell as well once this description-changing fork has made it in)

Idk java but, thoughts:

• you've added a second "Description".
• fix indentation in the initial code and add a space between // and the rest of the comment
• please use the test logic in my python fork above instead - because the one you're using and that several other languages are using is poor as it picks the same number of digit 90% of the time. (and the range of numbers you picked or copied is also weird)

Java traduction

updated

merged

Your code only cycles from 1 to 9 (both inclusive) and does not take into account the individual digits of numbers > 99

I've tested your solution and it passed the tests, closing

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

Accomplished in c++.

Fixed tests in C# is commented out for no reason

Nice kata!

Approved

Very enjoyable challenge, compliments.

Ruby update fork

• update to Ruby 3.0
• use assert_equals in sample tests
• add random tests