fork

C# Fork (adds random tests).

No random tests in C#

why is there no IEnumerable.Revers() method in string?

yes, it is just the condition of kata says you don't need that

Well, but you can add a validation for arguments to check if they're positive

Retired.

for a 8 kyu there shouldn't be any surprises, testing numbers is unnecessary

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/114.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

^^

Description should be language-agnostic

there are several flavors of base64 and in this kata padding is not required for either encoding or decoding. the description says :

Note: This kata uses the non-padding version ("=" is not added to the end).

all tests and attempts pass except:
12321
I can't see the difference, including len is same. Any special char or something?

Edited: I was checking the wrong variables for type, and it was giving me same type variables. They were not, so fixed it.

huum

Directions say to round the final result to 2 decimal places, but some tests expect an exact, crazy-long decimal. SOS