it's so easy for me. I'm very happy to improve my logic in javascript with codewars

oh, interesting.

This code is too complicated to read, for real!

same :D :D :D

oh no,your tab......
why?

i would have thought the arrow function would be better practice but seems not by way of vote, anyone keen to explain?

I tried coming up with some unique ways to call 'hello world!'. Had to settle for the easiest method though :P

Who else did the task in the simplest and easiest possible way just so they could see what others had done? Come on now, be honest! ;-)

I wouldn't think so, might be base of using Captial letters in the String?

makes the code readable

nem pensei em usar assim, vou treinar mais kkkk

Creating class like that feels kinda wierd tbh.

the result should be padded with empty elements.

You might want to clarify what empty elements mean, because different languages may have different definitions.

upon further exploration, it's because I change the argument arrays, and this makes the unit test expected calculation misbehave. Either the unit tests should be fixed (to at least display a meaningful error in that case...), or the instructions clarified.

Is there some issue with the random tests in ruby? I keep getting failures because it expects an empty array when I return an interleaved array. For example, in one of the random tests, the input was:
3 <<<<
t k 1 0 c l y <<<<
q x 5 <<<<
l 8 o s g a v <<<<
m v <<<<
j k s v r <<<<
b 4 s r f f 3 r <<<<
4 z 0 6 <<<<
<<<<
(each row is an array)
and I got the error message:
Expected: [], instead got: [3, "t", "q", "l", "m", "j", "b", 4, nil, nil, "k", "x", 8, "v", "k", 4, "z", nil, nil, 1, 5, "o", nil, "s", "s", 0, nil, nil, 0, nil, "s", nil, "v", "r", 6, nil, nil, "c", nil, "g", nil, "r", "f", nil, nil, nil, "l", nil, "a", nil, nil, "f", nil, nil, nil, "y", nil, "v", nil, nil, 3, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil, "r", nil, nil]