I guess it's the overflow considerations?

what is meant with the "worst case" ?

If the goal is to pass the test, that's fine. But this code cannot be considered best practice because it does not consider the worst case.

Edit: I've figured it out. Forking my own translation did the trick.
My new solution is based on the updated Go translation.

you should see a link "Edit Kata" in the top right corner of this page (on the left of "add to collection"). From there you can make the needed modifications.

Oh boy. Is there a way to update it? I'm new to the whole translation business.

Reference solution is incorrect, as pointed out by @konakona above:

(vec![2, 2, 101, 2], 6),

solved ;)

Added a Rust translation. Could someone check it?

Hia. I've added a Rust translation. Could someone check and approve it? :)

Nice. :D

Arrem, this solution is no longer valid :D

I'll look into it. Thanks!

No luck so far, though. This doesn't seem to do it, for some reason:

const parse = function(mapString) {
  return runInNewContext('parseMap(mapString)', { mapString, parseMap });
}

const runInNewContext = (script, sandbox) => {
  vm.createContext(sandbox);
  vm.runInContext('result = ' + script, sandbox);
  
  return sandbox.result;
}

Run the parseMap function in a sandbox

Yea, that shouldn't be possible :P
Any idea how I'd prevent this?