The numbers are actually correct

item | pts | free| pay
  0  | 31  |  1  | 0
  1  | 26  |  2  | 0
  2  | 21  |  3  | 0
  3  | 16  |  4  | 0
  4  | 11  |  5  | 0
  5  |  6  |  6  | 0
  6  |  1  |  7  | 0
  7  |  2  |  7  | 1
  8  |  3  |  7  | 2
  9  |  4  |  7  | 3
 10  |  5  |  7  | 4
 11  |  0  |  8  | 4
 12  |  1  |  8  | 5
 13  |  2  |  8  | 6
 14  |  3  |  8  | 7
 15  |  4  |  8  | 8
 16  |  5  |  8  | 9
 17  |  0  |  9  | 9
 18  |  1  |  9  | 10
 19  |  2  |  9  | 11
 20  |  3  |  9  | 12
 21  |  4  |  9  | 13
 22  |  5  |  9  | 14
 23  |  0  | 10  | 14
 24  |  1  | 10  | 15
 25  |  2  | 10  | 16
 26  |  3  | 10  | 17

Try not to use the editor for approved kata, makes managing things a pain in the arse since it's completely opaque as to what changes were made and when without opening the edit panel yourself (and thereby forfeiting the kata).

Ah, my bad.
It's approved now, thanks.

The kata is vulnerable to simple exploits like this:

def plus_or_minus(variables, test):
    return test.__self__.expr

(https://www.codewars.com/kata/reviews/65f8713d2a5c600001d40e8a/groups/66a7f0443fd52196719dc60a#66d498d675252935bab4bdbf)

This is an attempt to fix the issue by converting Tester to a function factory.

That's probably because the kata was changed after this fork was published (fixing Kayleigh's issue above).

I republished the fork: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/66d71fe89cee54b0364ef568?sel=66d71fe89cee54b0364ef568

Happy to merge this fix but clicking 'Approve' does not seem to do it

Python: Kata is vulnerable to certain exploits.

Details and proposed fix: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/66d5bb6300f911da4ce22e12?sel=66d5bb6300f911da4ce22e12

The kata is vulnerable to simple exploits like this:

def plus_or_minus(variables, test):
    return test.__self__.expr

(https://www.codewars.com/kata/reviews/65f8713d2a5c600001d40e8a/groups/66a7f0443fd52196719dc60a#66d498d675252935bab4bdbf)

This is an attempt to fix the issue by converting Tester to a function factory.

Attempt to solve this with function factory: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/66d5bb6300f911da4ce22e12?sel=66d5bb6300f911da4ce22e12

I think it is. Perhaps it could be prevented by making test a proxy object that delegates __call__() to the real Tester object ?

Isn't that technically cheating?

I solve it with using integer->string conversions, then without using integer->string conversions. But everytime a have Execution Timed Out (12000 ms)

In computing, the modulo operation returns the remainder or signed remainder of a division, after one number is divided by another (called the modulus of the operation).: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulo

Your solution is too slow.

@seika-afk The question is "How many digits?", so just count the digits :)