I did, I changed it to say "If the given number has a decimal point, all digits after the first non-zero digit is significant," which is correct for significant figures.

This is actually expected output, I have changed it to make the numbers distinct by having a decimal point, rather than being an integer or not.

(oops lol)

This is now mentioned

I have to say that I would never have thought of using lazy expansion like that, I really need to get used to using it more often.

Luckily, unlike that last one, this was a simple, quick fix.

Okay, along with the description, I've finally got rid of that lingering incorrect sigfig issue. It seems to be done.

That is intended input, I'll note it in the description. And 2500 tests because, I mean, it's not like it's difficult to do it, and the more tests the faster errors are found, right? vOv

Okay, I understand what you're saying now, sorry. I believe that the description is now correct.

I suppose that is what it says

I see nothing wrong with the way I worded it, but perhaps "unless there is a dot present after them" instead? as for 0.0002830, I'm working on fixing that

I had meant trailing 0's, I notice

I couldn't seem to find this problem any more, I'm going to say it's fixed

I did something that appears to have fixed it, but I don't know why it fixed it, so it's probably not fixed