Me too, man, me too. We should consider returning to monkey, i think

:)

@bennyBoy_JP thanks very much for the positive feedback! I'm glad you had fun with it, please try one of my other kata next :)

*impostor :)

:-)

I edited the kata and hopefully made error messages clearer. Please refesh the page, reset the trainer (back up your code first!) and please check if error messages are better.

Glad you enjoyed it. :)

You're welcome.

I'm glad you figured the final method! I like your curent solution)).
And btw weren't you trying to generate all the possible versions of the number plates and find the right one by index, at first ?
Good luck in the future katas anyways.

@bennyBoy_JP

• Well, Many many thanks for these kind words and such a tender compliment

• I've kept your previous comment as a souvenir (from Jumpinmg number kata's discourse), and I'll do the same with the above

• Hope you've Enjoyed the number series as well, and if you need any help concerning katas you can contact me on Gitter channel ..

• Wish you all the best On/Off Cw .. Regards .. Zizou

There is absolutely no need to think of that as 'cheating'. It's a very common pattern to track other things in a loop and do stuff (including breaking out) according to it. Even a for ... in ... loop is just a syntax for keeping track of an iterable. So there's no need to think you're doing something wrong here.

Also, if you managed to achieve your goal by 'simply' doing something, it's more likely a sign that you're doing something right rather than something wrong. Why do the complicated thing when the simple one will do.

If you do fiddle around with your code, a cleaner code can be found. Hint in the next spoiler-flagged comment.