nice

kcpadljmaşdsdmas çözüm aşırı verimsiz ztn best practices vermisler bi de

barzomusun bilader liste ne list yazsan vatan hainimi olucan haha

My method was pretty similar.

The randomised test data can produce inputs with multiple periods with equal visit counts. This proposed solution should include v1.entry_time asc in the order by to pick the earlier event in that case.

Without the order by it is liable to pick the later group, and that's the wrong answer here (as when_happened should be the earliest timestamp).

Maybe you used percentile_disc instead of percentile_cont?

This is now failing some test cases?

This one didn't pass for me. median needed to be a float (52.5) where my answer gave 52. Even casting as a float wouldn't work.

you're constantly generating new lists
for a long string this would cost youm better to build one output list drawing values individually testing against the original string

Ah, yes. I was about to make the same comment about ?*11=??. But you are right I missed this detail: "All of the ?s in an expression will represent the same digit (0-9), and it won't be one of the other given digits in the expression." I forgot to check whether the digit was the same as another one in the expression. Thanks!

Misses cases like "127.1.1.0" which is a valid but it will return False.

You can't start a integer with a zero in python unless it is zero.
eg. If you try: n = 0123, it will give a syntax error.

Tests are perfectly fine. Read the description again.

?*11=?? it can be 3, 4, 5, 6,7,8,9

8997+987?9=1077?6 in this random generated example both 0 and 2 work. OR another mistake in random example that I encountered is ?*11=??
1,2,3... all of them work for this example. I believe random examples should corrected.