Hi. I've added some random tests in Rust. Since I didn't add the original Rust translation, I'd be happy about some feedback on the additional tests. Thanks.

Eh, should have used return true for the empty iterator. Nvm.

Feel free to fork/resolve the conflict. The translation was posted two years ago, I'm not active anymore.

Can you please remove the using namespace std?

I've edited the tests (didn't have edit rights two years ago). They should be more robust now.

The String result remains, though, since that's in the kata's description. *sigh*

I'm not sure which language you use, apparently you mutate numbers:

Do not mutate the original array/list.

This is not an issue, as the kata/the tests aren't broken.

That being said return "hello"; and "hello" are the same if they are used as the last expression. However, could it be that "hello" isn't the last expression in your code?

Please post your code in a comment and mark it as having spoiler content.

Bob has to calculate his taxes. He usually uses a calculator and types in his three positions and then multiplies them with his tax rate. Since he sometimes forgets his tax rate, he wrote a program. But it prints the wrong results. Can you help him?

function bobsTaxes(work, personal, cat) {
return work + personal + cat * 19 / 100;
}

Yeah, the last Ruby random tests don't work. @g964, care to fix them?

Seems good. C# is one of those languages where expected comes before actual, right?

What does c(...) do in your (secret) reference solution? Other than that, I think I understand the R code, just didn't want to grasp another language yesterday during work, sorry.