Enabled in this fork

I passed 3 first tests but on the random tests i have this:
expected undefined to equal 49

Enabled in this fork

Fixed in this fork

Enabled in this fork

luckily I had some experience in backend before attempting this stupid kata

For all who struggles: in tests there is moveBehavior what is reassigned, not moveBehaviour (note u).

This kata was a bit annoying. I think it could have been a 7 KYU

there is actually no need to save into variables the functions in our answers to these exercises, as we're not asked to then use them as parameters in higher order functions, so we can use a function expression, rather than a function declaration (plus, especially with the concise arrow syntax, we can use functions diretly as argumemts in other functions, or define and call them at the same time as an IIFE, eg. ((n)=> {console.log(n=5);}10); that logs 15)

Given that rps is a pure function and the fixed tests are exhaustive, random tests don't really serve much purpose other than to weed out unsafePerformIO shenanigans. Nevertheless, I've added in random tests in a fork.

Please approve Shell Translation

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/67025dce1bd1710b319b05eb?sel=67025dce1bd1710b319b05eb

Your code is not exactly correct, it's not a valid solution of a Codewars kata. See this article for some hints: https://docs.codewars.com/training/training-example#writing-a-solution

The code I wrote is correct. I checked it on VS and it runs smothly, but it still gives an error when testing with the sample tests. As a beginner, the fact that no kind of info is given to know more or less where to start is disssapointing.

yay