thnx! Actually, it was quite a challenge.
Btw, isn't 7x7 skyscrappers or minesweeper a kind of 1 dan?

Hi Blind4Basics!

Very nice kata! Although it seems I went the harder way )))

Thanks!!

Hi Voile,
Could you pls change in the description (Haskell):
from
"You can throw multiple eggs in a single try."
to
"You can throw a single egg in a single try."

That means that instructions are wrong:

"Which means,

You can throw multiple eggs in a single try.
You are guaranteed to find the exactly maximal floor that the egg won't crack(the floor above this one will crack the egg).
You have n eggs and m tries.
What's the maximum height?"

Very nice kata! The next one should be "Mate in one" ))

It's fine now. Thanks!

Hi Blind4Basics,

It seems that in Java version of the kata "PieceConfig.equals()" tries to compare prevX,Y even when they are not present, resulting in exception "Piece wasn't moved before".

Ok.
Test cases for submission section have been corrected.
Test case for test section is still waiting for correction.

Haskell test is wrong for "abcdxg"

Thanks a lot!

geoffp, it checks for illegal chars not only encripting but decripting as well.

Hi ecolban,

In Haskell I've got the following warning:

/tmp/haskell117211-18-5cw4pu.46vrqz1tt9/MultiplicationFunction/Preload.hs:25:10: Warning:
No explicit implementation for
bitSizeMaybe' In the instance declaration for Bits Number'

Hi, Giacomo, could you pls check the source of the following message:

/tmp/haskell11722-18-1xoashi.1d16vfgvi/Main.hs:39:40:
No instance for (Foldable t0) arising from a use of concatMap' The type variable t0' is ambiguous
Note: there are several potential instances:
instance Foldable (Control.Applicative.Const m)
-- Defined in Control.Applicative' instance Foldable (Either a) -- Defined in Data.Foldable'
instance Foldable Data.Proxy.Proxy -- Defined in Data.Foldable' ...plus 88 others In the second argument of (.)', namely
concatMap ((\ x -> [x, 3 * x div` 4]) . div4able . getPositive)'