The sort in the couter chain on line 2 is totally unnecessary since the reduce returns an object. However nearly 30 people came up with this exact solution.

@Firefly2002
I'm here to write exactly the same comment except now its 6 + "20 more warriors".
With a relatively complex problem like this, if you ask 1,000 people to code it, I would expect 1,000 distinct answers.

12 people all with the same answer.. yeah, no not suspicious at all.

I apologize. This is not true, although I do not know why it wouldn't be. For some reason Array(count).map(_=>key) doesn't work as expected, or as I expect it to : )

Awesome solution - about one-hundredth the size of mine. One question: why was [...Array(count)].map..... used and not simply Array(count).map.....? It seems to me you arrive at the same result..