Ah, okay. That makes it clear. Thanks!

In the kata description, the conversion rate for the Indian Rupee is given as 63. However, R is a consonant!

The lines did sound familiar when I first read them, but your comment made me go back and check. Made my day!

There's an issue in test cases involving backward(), it says '0 should equal 1'.

1. The description says to return 'No solution' in case the discriminant is negative, but the test cases require that we write 'No real solution'.
2. There should be a way to validate answers from the list regardless of their order: returning [2, -2] instead of [-2, 2] shouldn't be a mismatch.

I faced the same problem and had to forfeit to see what was up.

The description says the name of the array is partyAges, but the example and actual code use the array party_ages.

The kata doesn't describe what the code is supposed to do, so it's unclear what we need to fix in it.

It's a simpler problem than you think :)

What? xD

Same. Please fix it.

Highly agree to this solution! At least a chance must be given to the 'cheater' to justify their code and perhaps come up with an alternative solution. Removing honour and the solution to the kata is also a much better solution contrasted to locking accounts or banning people from using the website (be it temporarily or permanently).