I liked this one--fun to think about and solve. Nice job!

https://docs.codewars.com/authoring/guidelines/submission-tests/#general-guidelines

• No sample tests
• Bad formatting of initial solution
• No information on a unit of the angle
• Formula seems to be wrong for angles above 170 degrees
• Tests use strict euality for returned angles
• The invalid cases do not really make sense. Returning an empty array on an invalid input makes even less sense. Do we even need tests for n < 3?

I will unpublish the kata so you can fix the issues. Feel free to republish after problems are fixed.

Yeah, I can see that being more appropriate. I was thinking that the paramater is technically a representation of a number, just not a base 10 number. I'll change it to input, though. That's more fitting, for sure.

This issue should be fixed.

I believe I have it fixed now.

Oh, that's no good! Is it because I used the same class name and method for both the solution and starter code?

Should be fixed now, thanks!

Solution setup signature still expects the argument to be int, while it should be string now.

I have rewritten the Kata to include the full range of base 13 numbers. I appreciate all the feedback!

You're both right, of course. I understood while writing it that you would never be able to get every value, but I thought it might be better for simplicity's sake to stick with integers. I'll gladly rewrite it to include the true range of base 13 numbers and change the input into a string.

Also, it is impossible to test every base 13 number, since numbers represented in base 10 don't have enough digits.

It does not really make sense to pass in an int variable and "asume it's in base 13". Values do not have really any base associated with them. They are just values.
Number base is a feature of a representation of a value. You can have a decimal representation, a base thirteen representation, a binary representation, but these are not int really.