Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Great kata, submitting it was REALLY satisfying!
Instructions were quite wacky though. At the very start I didn't really know what does outputting mean (
.
and,
instructions) and what I am supposed to return exactly, but after some time I finally understood it. The way_
and|
were described is off as well.<
,>
,^
andv
were described like this:START MOVING to the direction
, meanwhile_
and|
were described like this:MOVE to the direction
while it should beSTART MOVING to the direction
just like in arrows case. Debugging code to fulfill tests requirements was painful as well.This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I'm always very impressed when I'm struggling with a kata and then I find such simple solution - great job!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I didn't know you can convert range to list! Very clever.
That's because you're trying to iterate a NoneType object. Error raises if at least one of these arrays is None. Ciprian and I already explained you it in your previous question.
I forgot to convert balance to integer. Fixed that already :)
Thank you for the comment
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
No prob :)
ah ok thanks!
Instead of making such long wall of
if
statements you could just create a tuple of months, then look for index of month from current_date and expiration_date in this tuple and replace this month with index number.For instance:
I think this way would be easier and less backbreaking.
As I see while looking at others' solution I could use just one return statement at the end of function with
Fn1*Fn2 = prod
instead of... == False
. Wouldn't have to put if statement inside while loop and check it each time it repeats. My bad. I'm pretty proud of this code tho :)Loading more items...