snake case +1

fixed in latest fork

Approved

python new test framework + snake_case is required. updated in this fork

The function name in Python should be in snake_case.

thanks for the feedback - and the suggestion for a future kata. Will get working on it!

The output string seems a bit not logical when spaces == False: if spaces are not counted, the truncated output should contain mx characters AND all the spaces before that limit.

That would make the kata a bit more interesting... ;) (of course, this would invalidate lots of solutions. You could write a new verison this way and link the two between themselves, in their descriptions).

done - thanks again :)

I enjoyed this, thanks.

Yes, the description is better now! Couple of suggestions to clarify things even more:

1. Modify the last line to say: When the spaces argument is False, you should remove spaces from the "Answer".
2. Move that line above the examples.

Good spot - thanks! I've updated the examples, hope the description makes more sense now.

Overall, cool kata! I'm still a little confused about when to delete spaces from the input text though. That should be explained better in the description. Is the second example-response in the description correct?

charCheck("Cara Hertz", 9, false) should return [ true, "Cara Hertz" ]
Seems like it should return [ true, "CaraHertz" ] according to the actual test cases.

I'm still not sure though, more clarification in the description would be helpful.

I had to update my solution and only now actually read the test cases. Great! :]

Also, changed vote and approved. Make more!

Thank-you for taking the time to explain this. I've updated the kata according to your suggestion.

Returning inconsistent datatypes is ++Ungood™ and should be avoided.

You could just as easily have the function return [ true, "original string" ], [ true, "" ] or even just [ true ] instead of true. That would enable you to always process the Boolean return value as answer[0]. As it is, the function always returns a truthy value and you need to Array.isArray() (or equivalent) the return value to find out whether or not to further process it. Which is senseless.