Ad
  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Default User Avatar

    alright, i'm really sorry. i spent some hour working on one problem and just couldn't get why it won't pass this one case, im glad i was close to solving it, but it definitely didn't cover all the possible test cases. i wasn't used to getting no score for even solving most of the cases but one, i understand i have the responsibility to improve it but i just got so discouraged at some point because i kept solving problems and used a lot of time for nothing. anyway, i'm really sorry for my rudeness, i will try to overcome this attitude as i'm also dealing with personal problems. thanks.

  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Default User Avatar

    if programmers are known to be lazy, just remember this guy.

  • Default User Avatar
    • im obviously speaking from my experience, because ive solved many problems but could never level up my kata because i never COMPLETELY solve them

    There's no such thing as completely solving a kata. You either do or you don't. If you can't pass all test cases then you simply haven't solved anything, I don't see why one should get points for that.

    • because of some dumb case that was never mentioned

    They don't really have to be mentioned. You can always print the input and find what they are yourself.

  • Custom User Avatar

    What you are suggesting is, no offense, quite stupid. Firstly, if you want to earn "points by solving a problem based on the number of cases you solved", then what about katas ranked 8 kyu to 5 kyu? Are you saying that CW have to make a 7 kyu kata, with, say, 100 random test cases, worth a 100 points and that CWarriors can earn up to 100 points from solving one low-ranked kata alone? That defeats the purpose of random test cases.They are there to make sure that your code can and will run on all cases stated by the kata. If your code failed to do so, then IMPROVE on it and don't get discouraged.

  • Default User Avatar

    please add this, it's definitely a great idea. in lichess for example, you can have a competition with teams or individuals. even though, not many people would start out first, who knows. in 10 years, there will be thousands competing.

  • Default User Avatar

    hello, im not sure if you get points by solving a problem based on the number of cases you solved. i think this is very helpful, rather than not giving you points for all your hard work just because of some dumb case that was never mentioned. im obviously speaking from my experience, because ive solved many problems but could never level up my kata because i never COMPLETELY solve them. its not only annoying, its discouraging. i dont want to go back again and waste time. please fix the point system

  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Default User Avatar

    what do you mean that wasn't even easy, jesus, took me an hour

  • Default User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Default User Avatar

    instead of using enumerate, you could just also assign two values to dict to determine (count, isupper)

  • Loading more items...