Not very. It's so small because it has virtually no brains.

Major advantage is it's easy to prove correct, and ( within reason ) who cares about CPU time anyway?

This looks very elegant. How efficient is it actually?

When two numbers have the same "weight", let us class them as if they were strings and not numbers: ... 180 is before 90 since, having the same "weight" (9), it comes before as a string.

That basically means comparison by character codes. First non-equal comparison wins. '1' comes before '2', so 1anything also comes before 2anything.

As it turns out, string comparison in basically every language already works this way.

If we're going to engage in pedantry, the correct use would be "Hello, Name. How are you?" :)

freakin good nice 👌

I saw a pattern pretty much immediately, but i also started with more moving parts. :P Probably took 15-30 minutes farting around with concatenation before i saw a less clunky way.

Just of curiosity how long did it take you to see the pattern?

Description updated. If it needs more work, please file a new issue.

If you want better TDD tests, you should be able to write them yourself from the description now.

Closing.

@dances-with-peons ..

• Revised and Fixed
• Hope you enjoyed solving this kata , also the rest of mine humble ones
• Wish you all the best On/Off CW .. Regards .. Zizou

@SashaVosu ..

• Thanks for your question Bro , ah , By the way , There is a classification-friendly label Question to remark your comment and help the readr to identify
• Hope any Java trainee answers your question since I'm not so aware of java's matters .. Regards .. Zizou

@dances-with-peons ..

• Thanks for pointing out
• I've mentioned the NASM translator to consider the issue and do what is necessary .. and I'll keep the issue as un-resolved till modifications occur .. Regards .. Zizou

approved

Just published a NASM translation.