In the description, you wrote:

• The reinforces strings consist of only small letters.

Although, as we can see in the examples, it can also include digits.

Also, "reinforces" is a verb only. The correct noun is "reinforcements".

why s.slice(1) 2 times?

thanks!

Its more like 6kyu

Are you human? 🤣🤣🤣

Haskell translation

"I will take away their harvest" declares the Lord. 0.0

It is incredibly hard to check for test cases as well.
All of them do work upon manual logging.

JS tests are not valid, I think.
Same issues as xp3 had.

I was not able to replicate the problem, the reference solution returns false for 72 and other non-powers multiples of 4 such as 20, 44, etc. Nevertheless, I added those as fixed tests and upgraded the C# random tests to improve coverage. This kata still has a poor design in C# due to the parameter being an object and the input validation, which is already not a good idea, is underspecified and not toroughly tested.

shut up i did it !

Ah, the hidden message must've been too well hidden for you. Maybe next time I'll make it more obvious, bro

the first example is OK to follow and understand, the second example is too big .. why you didn't make the second example small too , but keep the essence on what we are suppose to do ? ain't got time to strain my eyes on those inputs bro

you right Im doing it in my local with the version .NET8 let met change to the .NET6