Mad Lad!

First of all, thanks for the quick response.
Some things are answered.

For one, I can say that I understand completely the 4.5 and 4.6 of your points. I can say that myself kinda fell into that at the beginning.
Secondly, I didn't know that you are not the author of this kata, and didn't dig much into it, since I saw your replies to an overwhelming amount of posts. I apologize for the direct approach solely towards you, as far as the construction of the problem goes.

Thirdly, I don’t think that it that in any way keeping the description of the kata somewhat confusing adds to the rank of the problem and compensates for the lack of complexity of the kata . So I don’t find it reasonable enough for the description to be kept the way it is and not add the explanation that I posted above, or one of the many others people have posted already. I actually solved the problem some minutes ago, but it was after I had to spend much more time digging in the comments to clarify my confusion than I should have.

In conclusion, I think my point is that you and me and everyone else could have spent our time in a much better way instead of clarifying things about this problem that could have been solved with the inclusion of a similar to my above explanation of the problem.
Thank you for your time. Happy Holidays!

Yes

Thank you! The instructions are poorly explained.

Your solution , although I bow to it's compactness, when run, returns 0 years, 0 days ... in some cases, which is forbiden from the kata, so... how did you trick it?