has been forked and approved

forked and approved

Hi @dmercertaylor - there have been a couple of issues raised about the C translation of this kata not matching the description. Any chance you could take a look at them?

I had time to look up this dynamic memory allocation thing and this was the main problem and I had a tiny logical too. I fixed everything and I passed all the tests. Thanks for your help!

I have just startred learning programming recently and I'm not sure what I need to return here. Because I tried to return a pointer which has the address of the first element of the string but it didn't work. (I put '\0' at end of the string) Could you help me?

Approved

Already reported below, closing this one.

The original translator gets the credit (honor), so no worries.

source: https://github.com/Codewars/codewars.com/wiki/Kata-Translations#forks

Can you try forking my translation? I did a fork initially but I was getting unresolved merge conflicts as well. I'm not sure how else to resolve it.

I made some edits to the description so it matches what's updated. Can you give it another try?

I'm not sure why you're trying to disable eval anyway. What does manually parsing arithmetic expressions have to do with this challenge in the first place? Besides, there are already too many "parse arithmetic expression" katas and we certainly don't need another one.

no because this version is in BF, which is a "stand alone" language, for katas (what is 8 kyu in a regular language can become 3 in BF)