you don't have nothing to do, this is look like a syndrome.

thats what I wanted to

there is actually no need to save into variables the functions in our answers to these exercises, as we're not asked to then use them as parameters in higher order functions, so we can use a function expression, rather than a function declaration (plus, especially with the concise arrow syntax, we can use functions diretly as argumemts in other functions, or define and call them at the same time as an IIFE, eg. ((n)=> {console.log(n=5);}10); that logs 15)

when you want to solve a problem, better way is using the fundamentals of the language not the built-in function.

Classes are just syntactic sugar meant to encapsulate code and abstract(hiding unnecessary details) code. The code would still work in this case without classes and by simply just writing the function

good shot

Your codes are very clean

Yes Of Course it can simply work without classes. Just write the function outside of the class code block literal and invoke the function like this: findSmallestInt([23, 45, 67])

no way bruh

"That one guy"? This is the second most popular solution. 😆

there is always that one guy with the arrow functions

same here lol