resolved

ok, I found the translation and approved it. Tests are updated accordingly. I didn't get description conflicts, so I hope everything is good...

@Heathro: the changes of a translation are applied only when it's approved.

actually, working with forks can mess the things up too

Oh ok. Good to know...

but when I enter translation I see updated

Is there a link to this updated fork? I don't think you can self-approve it (someone else should do it).

@Heathro: you saw my answer above? (the issue)

(actually, working with forks can mess the things up to, considering how the forking process is working right now, so... For now, there is no "best way"... Hopefully fixed in near future)

agreed. thank you. next time I will be professional :)

It was mine java translation

Yes I noticed. It's not that bad in this case, and if you really know what you're doing, it's probably ok. But usually it's better to just work with a fork, so you don't accidently mess something up :P (you can see which lines you changed or removed)

na, that's ok if you're the translator.

It's okay for you to fix in editor as long as you know how and what to fix, then all good !!!

Nope, not at all.
You have to work on a copy of the input in the ref solution.

to be clearer: the very first line of code of the ref solution is mutating the input. That's the problem

oh. ok. It was mine java translation. wanted to fix it. sorry

Do NOT go around editing other users' katas. If there is an issue, you should raise one, or publish a fork with working tests, NOT editing the kata directly.

already sorted. thanks