Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
I dedicate my soliton to the fan in my room that kept me cool during that hot process (java)
A very good and challenging 4 kya kata indeed
Great and funny kata on dynamic programming.
Writing your own minigame is always fun
Great kata, solved non-recursively!
Lo dejé de intentar hace meses, pero le daré otro intento a ver que tal :)
proba una forma recursiva. recorre el tablero y checkea si corresponde a la palabra, si lo es, revisa si alguna de las adyacentes corresponde a la siguiente letra y etc.
Usando las letras diagonales, se puede formar la palabra 'CEREAL'
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
I need some help, I've made the challenge with Javascript, but I have no chance to submit because of this("Random tests"):
TypeError: board[x].map is not a function
at randomBoard
at /home/codewarrior/index.js:224:10
at /runner/frameworks/javascript/cw-2.js:152:11
at Promise._execute
at Promise._resolveFromExecutor
at new Promise
at describe
at /home/codewarrior/index.js:144:1
at /home/codewarrior/index.js:248:5
at Object.handleError
I have the same issue. How did U solve this?
My func modifies the board and this seems to persist across tests. That's pretty annoying
It should be passing all the simple tests as it is but it's failing.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This is a fantastic kata. I saw it as an opportunity to brush up on recursion and data structures.
yes, you modify board in function
Yeah for the JS kata I'm 100% sure my code correctly does what it's intended to. But the test cases are broken. If I make the result year less than the year they ask for, I get "expected 3 to equal 4" and if I make it less than or equal to, I get "expected 51 to equal 50". So, forget it. Seems like author put the wrong expect value in the tests. Or maybe there's some secret catch to the problem that I missed in the instructions. It's a shame Codewars doesn't show us the test inputs so it's impossible to debug why it failed. Anyway I agree with you, moving on!
Loading more items...