@nUG48YpaiHBG you mean in terms of performace?

You're troll :)

Turned out output format is dumb af. Printed log inside a drop-down triangle is actually for following test. So, my code in fact fails on 12341234 [DIeF IeFD 12341234 41234123 34123412 23412341]. Sorry for bothering.

I can't think of anything that prints nothing at all. Even (println "" []) would print at least [].

Clojure version, one test doesn't pass.
Trying to figure out why with
(defn contain-all-rots [strng arr] (println strng arr) ...

and get nothing but expected: (= act exp) - actual: (not (= false true)) for it. The rest tests print out log as expected :\

Just for lulz?

It works just fine in this form two_count=lambda n:~n&1and-~two_count(n/2), no?

what c is for? to make c(n/2) shorter?

Can you please explain that last line? It's not very intuitive as for me.

Wat's going on here?

Aww, man, couldn't you come up with more elegant solution? :(

Bruteforce, huh? :D

Thanks :)

It would be helpful if you put such example in the description for dumbasses like me :D I really missed that point. Maybe because it wasn't stressed enough.

Oh, man, kata description is so incomplete.