Nice. Similar to mine, but slightly more efficient. Wise use of the for loop. I chose a while loop, which required one more variable than is necessary with the for loop.

And your solution just looks cleaner than mine. Less clutter, simpler variable names. Nice work.

very clever. never thought of this.

For min/max, it's probably not possible to go below O(n), I guess?

thanks! Though I just wanted to speed run some easy kata so my solution is highly unoriginal

Lmao I just saw your solution; good one.

Interesting approach. Not best practice but damn interesting, reminds me of bubble sorting! Very clever though.

reminds me of bubble sort

r

This is an interesting solution.

this reminded me of programing with C. Good job

interesting solution!

Why is this long winded block of code best practice ?

Apparently I was wrong, I changed names, I did not think you could use a keyword as the name of a function, that could lead to bugs or flaws I assume

For correct indentation and format you have to use ` . Three times at beginning and three times at ending.

Code-Snippet
   WithSpacings