Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    I am getting a weird error when trying to submit my solution and the error is not very descriptive

    TypeError: Cannot read property '10' of undefined
               at Object.handleError
            at ContextifyScript.Script.runInThisContext
        at Object.exports.runInThisContext
    
  • Custom User Avatar

    It's working now! Thanks very much.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Good job, seems to work as expected now.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Hi, I'm the original author of this Kata (Ruby version). Author of the haskell version didn't understand this Kata properly, and indeed added a DFS version instead of BFS.

    I have learned haskell to fix this. I added a BFS solution and a correct buildTree (thanks to @nickie for providing one). Please take a look again.

    Thanks,
    Karol

  • Custom User Avatar

    Post your solution and mark it as a spoiler, I will check it.

  • Custom User Avatar

    This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution

  • Loading more items...