Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Wow, that conversation is still going on. Ok, let me chip in.
I still think it's a shitty solution. But hey, since it's not a real-world problem - why bother? You can do whatever you want :)
It looks like someone does not understand the definition of a comment / opinion - "you've picked a fight". WTF man? I just left a comment. My opinion. You don't like it? I couldn't care less.
"That's not going to happen, mate." - holy crap, these are some strong words. What are going to do? Convince me that this code is obvious for professional, experienced programmers like yourself and noobs like me should just shut up and learn? Please.
I wanted to be nice and bury the hatchet since I wasn't going to war or anything. But it seems that I triggered some people ("hurr durr noob!"). You want to go on with your crusade - be my guest. It's you who's ranting, not me.
Have fun, I'm going back to my "hello world" example in JS, maybe I'll finally get it right!
Thanks, will do all of it.
I'll think about that, thanks!
Thanks for the feedback. I will test Ramda method usage.
Ramda is not a framework. It's a library, a collection of FP-like functions, to help you implement FP in you JS code. It's not a new invention. Ramda comes from Haskell, which is a pretty damn good FP language :)
No, it does not add any value. This series of kata is for people who want to get familiar with Ramda. We want to cover all Ramda methods, so you'll eventually have to read about every one and use them.
I have some ideas how to enforce usage of the required methods :) I will test them soon.
Thanks, will do so.
Got it, thanks!
Thanks for the feedback! I'll do it :)
Voile, this went totally in the wrong direction. You generalized my comment sticking to this specific example.
I'm all in for clean, readable code. I love one-liners, where they make sense. I love FP, composition etc.
But you bashed my comment as if I was saying "hurr durr, dumb solution, I don't get it". I was only pointing out that code like this might be hard to understand for others.
That's all, cheers.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution