I saw :D

Because if the author decides to return to this kata some day, he'll know that there're more problems than just "tests are bad".

it's already in the draft section, why raise another issue?

This is also a duplicate. This kata already implements the idea of using different words for numbers divisible by integers other than 3 and 5.

This kata seems to utilize this idea as well.

This is bad.

Please don't ever do anything like this.

Wow, I made this more complex than it had to be.

It is and I say this by way of excuse and minor embarassment significantly more performant than the most often provided solution here. However, there's some fairly obvious performance improvements to be made to the other solution that would make it blaze past this.

Learning..that's what we're here for.

mmm... again, the infos and the link are rather here so that you can do better on a further kata submission. This one, you should really unpublish it (it's highly probable that it gets retired if you don't: I suppose that most of the users that do betas won't upvote it)

I agree wholly with your list.

Thank you, as well, for the link. I'll adapt.

.

I don't doubt that you learnt something, but will others learn something doing it? On that, I have strong doubts.

na REALLY seriously...

• not enough tests
• need random tests
• sample tests do not even have a "fizzbuzz"-like result (no, foobar is not of the same kind)
• dicts used are ridiculously small, considering what you should test

Summary: sorry, but the idea is bad, and the execution is even worse... :/
You should unpublish this.

Note: please, use the version 2 of the test framework

Oop, I see it now, thank you!

I'm not sure that I'm getting enough information to solve the problem.

What does '(:)' mean in your comment?

As for seriously, yeah, I learned something writing this...

solution setup is incorrect (:)

Other than that... Seriously...? :o

It's not as if we already have shit tons of fb problems... x/

Not very safe, as it mutates the input. I was actually just trying to see if there was a test case for that ;)