Haskell fork that adds random tests and also updates fixed tests to show inputs upon failure.

Thanks.

This one should fix it

It looks like the first input array contains extra -45 and second (expected output) array contains 17 instead of this -45

The first array is your output and the second array is the expected output. If you want to see the input that is causing your solution to fail, you should print it yourself. See https://docs.codewars.com/training/troubleshooting#print-input.

In the future, please use the Question label when asking for help. See https://docs.codewars.com/training/troubleshooting#post-discourse.

Hi,

I failed this test :
expected [ -41, 10, -41, 18, -29, 26, -21, -17, -21, -17, -28, -46, -20, -29, -17, -15, 12, 16, 3, 3, -15, -17, -40, 3 ] to deeply equal [ -41, 10, -29, 18, -21, 26, -17, -17, -15, 3, -28, -46, -20, 3, 3, 9, 12, 16, 11, 29, 35, 39, -40, 41 ]

It looks like the first input array contains extra -45 and second (expected output) array contains 17 instead of this -45

thought it was a weird bug so I had a look. my findings: groovy % is rem not mod

See the issue above.

Groovy: random tests reference solution seems wrong.

Incorrect answer for array = 
[-34, -37, -29, 33, -24, -24, -4, 43, -36, -35, 17, -43, 44, 17, -44, -34, 45] ==> 
expected: <
[-34, -37, -29, 17, -24, -24, -4, 17, -36, -35, 33, -43, 44, 43, -44, -34, 45]> 
but was: <
[-34, -43, -37, -35, -24, -24, -4, -29, -36, 17, 17, 33, 44, 43, -44, -34, 45]>

For the 2nd element (first odd number), -43 seems smaller than -37.

Approved

Wow, this one made me THINK. Very nice though. Felt awesome when I solved it.

Good exercise, bad description.

I think a blind man would write a better instruction description than it is now

Improved Groovy translation

The translation is problematic

• No sample tests

• No random tests

• No assertion messages

• No static method and non-specific data types

• It appears the translator was utilizing a template from production code to write the translation, such code may not be applicable in the context of CW and can be hard to maintain

You may reject it and fork a new one if you wish ^^