eval = require = function doNotUseEvalOrRequire() {

IMHO let's not use double assignment even in the author-facing side as it's so rare an idiom / so anti-standard-style. Two separate assignments is much clearer.

LGTM otherwise

Approved

(forgot to mark resolved)

Approved

This should probably be reviewed relatively carefully. It was made a while ago and I vaguely recall being dissatisfied with the translation in general. As to whether it makes sense in JS - I just made it for fun, not as a lesson in practicality. Haven't thought about whether HLs have a practical place in the JS toolbox.

Heh. I decided to take it one step further: https://www.codewars.com/kata/reviews/6228a0dd593ae5000105204f/groups/6282ed557d4bcc00010c819b

Some optimizations to better take advantage of Scott numerals. Thanks @JohanWiltink

(Marking resolved)

Done

@JohanWiltink translation here.

If that's approved, how should I deal with this beta kata – is there a delete button? Ask a mod? Archive it somehow?

EDIT: I tried to delete it and it said "User does not have permission to perform this action".

EDIT2: Un-published.

Lambda Calculus translation.