Exactly. My original solution put that value into each row because of the unclear wording. I did learn something new from that though so not all bad. :)
No @o the second condition is correct. 'brave' can only appear in quality1 (so quality1 can't be 'evil') which leaves quality2 as possibly being 'evil'.
Nice!
Its so advanced. You're the Hero!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
love switch!
SO SIMPLE - - - - - I ADMIRE YOU
Now i realized, how dumb i am.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Just simple as it should be!
The $ is just a character in the string. Is there a reason you think it would need to be escaped?
How come the $ does not need to be escaped in this solution?
Why refer to an output table when you are just returning a query?
Exactly. My original solution put that value into each row because of the unclear wording. I did learn something new from that though so not all bad. :)
No @o the second condition is correct. 'brave' can only appear in quality1 (so quality1 can't be 'evil') which leaves quality2 as possibly being 'evil'.
No @v because 'cunning' can only appear in quality2 so to have both qualities, 'evil' can only appear in quality1.
Loading more items...