This suggestion is useless without specifying languages it applies to.

Added a Haskell fork that completely overhauls the existing translation and adds random tests.

Approved for test framework update.

And that is why using var is generally considered as a bad practice...

It's difficult understanding some katas like this one, challenging.

Random tests should also generate invalid cases (at least 30-50% of the time) and not just rely on fixed and sample tests (presumably all languages)

Missing fixed, sample and random tests for cases below:

• n = true / false

• n is a floating-point number (1.23)

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

same solution

Oh I see now. I was confused because I thought you were checking for duplicates in the set, which wouldn't make sense. Thanks for your help!