It's little more than converting a math equation to your language's syntax

Hello anyone,
i passed everything , except some giving "You didn't return a string: False should equal True"
Any idea why?

for example : random tests: 1,4,7,10,13 ...

Very good Kata , this can be used in real life projects !
Too bad there is this >>>' not 'you can build all these objects in one play'.<<< , this could be something even better !
@mentalplex How about another variation, maybe in another Kata where one can "investigate" all the possibilities , probably one will need some concept on Trees or similar , but i think it's feasible with primitive data structures knowledge.

Very good one indeed!

what's the purpose of this kata ? so basically if we change the "quotations" inside functions / returns are not one line we fail???

more like a Project Euler thing than a codewars.

I'm not sure but , did the tests checked things like "xyz@abc.com" ,"5:20PM" "1+2=3","$13.20","12/01/2023","Error" (by the way Error is ........).
One more thing : in Morse code there is operations such: Start of emission , end of emission , Break, Closing,,Understood, Wait and more

I think the Kata would be better if it includes thoses too

maybe you're right , but i don't trust python with such delicate mater knowing that in python
3.000000000000000001==3 gives True

Strange, my code didn't work FEW DAYS AGO (for basic tests), but now (when i give it a try) it works like charm !

at least there is one True , but not all True :)

Tricky Kata especially while interpreting the phrase "returns True if only some (but not all) the elements in the sequence are True after applying the predicate" :)

To be honest, this is more than a 7kyu, i would say 6 even 5 kyu !
took me a while to solve it !

I liked this one !

thanks, glad you enjoyed it :)

Really good Kata ! i like it, and i had fun doig it !

Thanks @B1ts