nesting ternary is not bad practice. Nesting Ternary without using parantheses to increase readability is bad practice.

Approved some pending translations and changed single quotes for double quotes (if some language uses both for strings the safe bet is using double quotes I think).

This will lead to merge conflicts in adding new languages, so it's best to leave it as it is as one can view the sample tests for the language-specific output

From the description: "If a user ranked -8 completes an activity ranked -4 they will receive 160 progress, resulting in the user being upgraded to rank -7 and having earned 60 progress towards their next rank"

I thought like you at first. But now I think, true is fine. Because you would use such a function to check for Parentheses errors in strings, not whether Parentheses exist at all. Thus an empty string has no wrong parenthesis -> valid string -> true. The same applies for non-empty strings without parenthesis.

Interesting to see the standard approach done within 1 line. But seriously, who voted "Best Practices"? nested ? operator is a horror for every reader.

true, the top 2 solutions at the moment would fail

Sources for more Katas:

• https://www.reddit.com/r/dailyprogrammer/

Yeah, GetColor() has to be added to the description or remove GetColor() from the tests (C#).

You may edit the description to fit to the selected language. I was confused by the ' ' in the examples because I thought that means the tower should have walls consisting of '

You can use the markdown language for it:
https://www.codewars.com/docs/kata-creator

example for c# + python:
```csharp

{
    "     *     ",
    "    ***    ",
    "   *****   ",
    "  *******  ",
    " ********* ",
    "***********"
}

```
```python

[
  '     *     ', 
  '    ***    ', 
  '   *****   ', 
  '  *******  ', 
  ' ********* ', 
  '***********'
]

```

I think because he used .net framework where you need a special syntax to use replace with string delimiter. He probably didnt know it.