I disagree with "shortest runtime == best", in general. Legibility and maintainability are often more important. Runtime (and memory space) optimizations can be important in some cases, but you need to have a look where it makes most sense and try to avoid premature optimization.
yes shortest is not the best, but the code that executes the fastest is the best and this code is the least time taken to execute, so yeah,its the best ;)
.avif)
I disagree with "shortest runtime == best", in general. Legibility and maintainability are often more important. Runtime (and memory space) optimizations can be important in some cases, but you need to have a look where it makes most sense and try to avoid premature optimization.
yes shortest is not the best, but the code that executes the fastest is the best and this code is the least time taken to execute, so yeah,its the best ;)
Shortest != best
it's cool but still very resource intensive
one of the best solutions ive seen here...
Spoiler flags!
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
❤️