• last class method is not tested in any language now, so should be removed from description

• Also language agnostic for description....

python fork with:

• faster solution
• new test framework
• updated description

JS: Input from Fixed tests are strings not integer.

Ruby example tests are (as I noticed in other Ruby katas as well):

# From Ruby 3.0, RSpec is used under the hood.
# See https://rspec.info/
# Defaults to the global `describe` for backwards compatibility, but `RSpec.desribe` works as well.
describe "Example" do
  it "should return the sum" do
    expect(add(1, 1)).to eq(2)
    # The following is still supported, but new tests should now use them.
    # Test.assert_equals(add(1, 1), 2)
  end
end

I think there's something wrong on Codewars.

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/93 Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

This kata (2016) is a duplicate of Additionless addition (from 2014).

The function used by tests is (confusingly) missing in Haskell's initial code.

"Weird" denominations should be considered in the description...

Julia translation

JavaScript should use Test.assertDeepEquals/chai.assert.deepEqual.

JS: the random tests are all using Test.expect, which means I have no clue about what the problem is with my solution... x/

No random tests in Ruby.

Ruby tests should not use Test.expect.

No sample tests in Ruby.

JavaScript version is using global variables which can easily coincide with variables created by the user.