For any kata, if you feel that there is some confusion about the details in the description, feel free to propose changes to the description using the suggestion flag. Best of luck!

Totally valid. That makes sense. Though, a bit confusing. Also, I think I need to look back at my solution

The function is named dynamic_caller and it receives two arguments.
One of them is obj, the other is method.
The description says:

the given method will never require any arguments

which refers to the second argument passed into dynamic_caller.

Either I did it wrong and the tests are too vague or the given code setup is rather misleading. The details say the method should not have args. Wouldn't that mean that the given args of obj and method are not needed?

Approve my fork,

Description merge conflict :-(

I didn't translate it, I just updated the original one to be of better quality :)

Done.

Are you sure a class is needed? A simple function won't do? The python version uses a function, but you probably translated it from another language.

Also, it may be better to calculate the expected result before the test, otherwise it may be vulnerable to input manipulation.

Needs random tests.
Sample tests: line.new.tickets????

Fair point Voile, I didn't think about how small the sequence is, just thought it would add an interesting extra layer of complexity to the existing upside-down integers kata. Oh well, live and learn.

I love the idea of this kata, but I really felt your README let it down. It wasn't at all clear what methods the ORM is expected to make available.

The fact that records should only be saved to the 'database' when an explicit save message is sent, and not on instantiation, is pretty counter-intuitive.

hi,

• the description is incomplete: what about 2 and 5 digits? you need to give the complete table of equivalences between digits.
• what's the supposed input range? (max upper value, for instance)
• are the boundaries inclusive or exclusive or inclusive/exclusive?
• mihght be very close to other already existing katas:
  • Upside-Down Numbers
  • Upside-Down Numbers - harder
  • any kata about primes

=> sure that far enough of any of those to not be a duplicate?

Done => no, that's way too close from the other upside-down katas.

in addition:

• not enough tests
• not enough random tests
• lacking most of the important edge cases (boundaries on strobo primes)
• again, lacking too much information in the desription

please unpublish it.

No problem! Glad it makes more sense now.

Nice. Definitely an improvement in my opinion. Also, apologies for flagging this as an 'ISSUE', I didn't mean to!