Time.new does not use require. It is inbuit.

It isn't. Rather, it's a incorrectly upvoted not-so-good practice.

Why is floor function a better practice than div function?

That's not the index though, why use that word?

Seconded.

Feels good when you find that in the docs, right? :p

@suic, confirmed the fix. Thanks :)

Ok. Thanks for your help. Let's continue to solve another katas )).

Really helped! Thanks!
But I did not understand completely why my version was wrong ).

a[a.index(i)]=(i.reduce(:+))
-and-
r.push((i.reduce(:+)))

gives the same result. I'm confused ))

@suic Jake has fixed the Kata so it can be edited. Please try again so we can clear this issue with the Haskell translation. Also, I added a new test case to each translation including Haskell.Many Thanks.

@suic, you're welcome :)

Btw. Have you ever considered translating katas to Haskell?

No, I'm not interested in translating kata at the moment. I decided to contribute to CodeWars by testing, helping to debug and leaving feedbacks because I'm more motivated to help kata authors/translators than to produce new contents.
I've read many harsh (often irrational) comments towards kata authors/translators :( I'd like to prevent those if I can by finding issues early and reporting thoroughly or by leaving feedbacks mentioning potential issues and suggesting improvements :]

The testing you do is quite a big help :) Thanks for that!

The redesign wasn't that difficult at the end. I can't publish the fix due to this issue.

Btw. Have you ever considered translating katas to Haskell? Is kind of fun :)

Regards,

suic

@suic, thanks :) I'm not familiar with QuickCheck so I can't help you redesign, but I'll test it again once you fix it :]