Java Fixed Test Sets Improvment.

reset the trainer: that's not the current version. Surely you tried it a long time ago and it has been corrected in the meantime (or someone just did it).

Java sample test reports on STDERR:

./src/test/java/SolutionTest.java:11: error: cannot find symbol
assertTrue(Kata.fecolaast("chickadee","chote cake"));
^
symbol: method fecolaast(String,String)
location: class Kata
1 error

The C++ kata description says unsigned long. The max unsigned long number in C++ is about 10 digits, i.e. tests and control functions differ from problem description and it is a bug. Maybe the correct C++ description is unsigned long long, however the assert statements have to be updated in that case.

For those numbers the control function expects 65441025342 (at least now), have you clicked reset and tried again?

The test is not mine. It is a random generated test during attempt test phase and test numbers are reported by codewars. I simply copy/paste that test and both solutions, mine and ready made one from unlocked solutions report the 95 as a result?? At the same time the test says that the result must be 97?

and the result is 95 again, i.e. it is not 97 as a test states preliminary

Either there're problems with the reference solution or with your tests. I haven't solved this one, so I can't investigate.

and the result is timeout

Then your solution is not efficient enough.

I'm gonna close this issue, because it has changed to something else (unrelated). Below @GiacomoSorbi solved some C++ kata issues, so, click reset a few times and try again. If you still see that behaviour, report it in a separate post.

Meanwhile, I unlock C++ solutions, and pass the same C++ test on my local PC with a a ready made unlocked solution and the result is 95 again, i.e. it is not 97 as a test states preliminary?!

More over I passed a JS solution with 106 green test (during attempt) of total 100 huge tests and the result is timeout, please write an eficient algorithm??

Why wrong?
I tested the same C++11 source code, however the results are not same???

Not a question. It's impossible to tell what's wrong with your solution if nobody can see it.

Yes, you are true. The bug is mine,
however the bigest C++ unsigned long is 4 294 967 295,
i.e about ten decimal digits,
and at the same time random test (during attempt)
passes me 12 digit numbers

such as
assert(solution({340445127495, 60921759657, 293857899522, 204267076497,
347612393337, 258021570312, 25085430447, 14334531684, 168430747287,
129010785156, 336861494574, 304608798285, 322526962890, 21501797526,
146928949761, 272356101996, 28669063368, 136178050998, 150512582682,
229352506944, 318943329969, 7167265842, 161263481445, 236519772786,
351196026258, 118259886393, 172014380208, 39419962131, 236519772786,
218601608181, 43003595052, 344028760416, 250854304470, 3583632921,
297441532443, 57338126736, 175598013129, 293857899522, 211434342339,
351196026258, 247270671549, 315359697048, 154096215603, 311776064127,
139761683919, 222185241102, 143345316840, 351196026258, 351196026258,
222185241102, 347612393337, 143345316840, 175598013129, 283107000759,
225768874023, 336861494574, 10750898763, 186348911892, 240103405707,
265188836154, 258021570312, 107508987630, 354779659179, 204267076497,
46587227973, 193516177734, 75256291341, 254437937391, 25085430447,
275939734917, 204267076497, 64505392578, 17918164605, 154096215603,
193516177734, 326110595811, 243687038628, 68089025499, 225768874023,
240103405707, 265188836154, 326110595811, 261605203233, 215017975260,
286690633680, 78839924262, 53754493815, 100341721788, 89590823025,
222185241102, 71672658420, 344028760416, 240103405707, 333277861653,
311776064127}) == 340445127495) ;

I'm not sure if that's the cause of this issue too or not, but there are negative numbers generated because of overflows.

Thank you! Everything works now.