This is cool, but it's not easy to read. Code should be as simple and easy for readability and maintainability.

true this is a good case of bad pratices the code should be/try to be easy to read to any person new to the code

Difficult to read

Mine is similar :)

You don't need the spoiler flag here. For some reason I cannot unmark it even though I have over 500 honor.

Description says:

1000 ≤ year ≤ 9000

Honestly I din't know about the min function either, but was also able to do it with a loop. I personally think that will help you in the long run. You can learn all the shortcuts later, if you know how to work through the problem without a built in function, that's great imo.

This wouldn't take into account years that don't have 4 digits.

So many votes for this being best practice. This is not best practice. Readability > Complexity.

Do only I have to my_eyes.split() to read that code?

If you want ridiculous, check mine out, lol

And we all seek ridiculous one-liners in solutions section - that's a lot of fun.

One liners have a better performance in general?