I think 'inhumanely fast' would be under 10. Considering the written test has a bot with a time of 3 and all human names have times far greater then 10.
Performance would be measured in how many points a person gathered in which time.

I had the same problem as you, I posted a question about it.

Oh, now I see them. The extra comma in the first two tests threw me off.

Well, the third test is still missing a comma.

There's one missing comma but there are expected values.

Example tests are not properly written. Syntax is wrong, and there are no expected cases.

Please clarify:

• How to calculate the performance
• How to determine if a user's completion time is "inhumanely fast" (what's the criteria?)

I love this

That example was for JavaScript; as far as JS is concerned anything below 53 bits are valid.

So... what's the issue?

If you have questions with your code please raise as a question.

So I'm pretty sure this Kata has a problem. I attempted a very roundabout method to getting the result which worked apart for the random cases. Obviously there was a far easier method that I missed which is why 90% of people don't have an issue with this. But I'm pretty sure there is something wrong with this code.