Супер!

I think its pretty readble to me.

Stop writing one line! It is not readable

well, most of times we call some functions without knowing how it's done inside the blackbox, that is abstraction. it is a fact that is not readable but you would not need to read that.

Unreadable. I wish code like this would not get upvoted so much. This is not best practice.

Please stop arguing guys. All those solutions are bad, yours and mine too. We parse twice the array while it would be so easy with only one pass.

@WloHu list comprehension is an important thing to learn for python newbies. And your solution actualy IS shit

lol

donio95, because soriting takes O(n*log(n)) time, finding the minimum takes O(n) time.

sekulski, why is it have greater computational complexity than list of lens?

However, it has much greater computational complexity.

I love how simplistic this is. Instead of writing a code to find the shortest, make the shortest the first then grab the length of the first.

I have to concure with j.pihlgren, it is not clear what you are saying at all. If you are going to critique the solution could you please provide a better explanation as to what is expected as what is presented is not clear at all.

Moving on, failing any solution just because you don't like it limits the creativity of everyone involved including yourself.

If something solves a problem it is valid, period.

This shouldn't be here. The idea is kind of clever but the implementation is bad.
I fail everyone who does any([...])-like stuff and ] + [ instead , or "" + "" instead "" "".

It's ok that you are experimenting but I mostly shame people for bringing this up for newbies to learn "good practices".