The error in the random test cases in the Python kata should be fixed. Please let me know if problems persist.

It should be fixed as of 9 hours ago. It was an error in the check I used to determine the outcome on the random generator (where my code said == but my logic was <=).

Either the description should detail (at least somewhat) the purpose of the function, or comments should list the purpose of various lines.

The assert_equals_ statements are backwards, which can lead to confusion

e.g. if the answer is "RRD" and the given is "RDD" the response will read that "RRD should equal RDD"

Lack of test cases

I agree with others that changing the example string in the description to a random string (like '149283410') would go a long way towards alleviating any confusion about the meaning of 'consecutive numbers'

I found the description confusing at first, but I have no suggestions for improvements at the moment.

Wording in the description is quite confusing.

There is some lack of punctuation in the description.