What if triangle does not exist with the given sides? Maybe add an appropriate test case aka "not exist"?

include impossible triangles as a possible type. ie, a + b >= c

Hi,

CW is not there for you to post your homework assignments. Thx to not do that again.

Cheers

need help please

Add test cases: start with opening bracket.

Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses(")(")).To(Equal(false))
Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses("}{")).To(Equal(false))
Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses("][")).To(Equal(false))

Add test cases: mixed bracket types.

Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses("(}")).To(Equal(false))
Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses("{)")).To(Equal(false))
Expect(ValidMixedBracketsParentheses("[)")).To(Equal(false))

Comparing values is not a novel or interesting idea, and IIRC there's already a kata with an exact same task as well.

So many problems with this kata:

• the fixed tests aren't sufficient (incomplete test coverage, even for a kata as simple as this)
• no random tests
• the tags include "triangles, maths, algorithm, easy, beginner"; only two of these qualify (hint: the last 2)

Such a rudimentary kata and yet the author hadn't even put in the bare minimum effort.

Needs additional tests as incorrect solutions have been approved.

Similar for https://www.codewars.com/kata/5277c8a221e209d3f6000b56 but less detailed info

Here is JavaScript solution
JavaScript translation
Here is Ruby solution
Ruby translation

Needs more (random) tests

No random tests