Some wrong!
In the last test case the response of my code is "Hmm, this would be better with input validation ... !". Not "Hmm, this would be better with input validation [dot] [dot] [dot] !"

Lua translation!

Approved

Python Translation

• new test framework
• more logical emails generation in random tests

Added, please approve

This is an issue :-)

JS

• no random tests

• Node 18. should be enabled

No random tests in C#

Not a kata issue as 500++ warriors pass the JS version. Try to print your input maybe u forgot to replace some of the '.' / '@'.

Likewise. Very frustrating.

Thanks for this kata!

The description says:

(return a positive integer unless conditions are not fulfilled in which case return -1)

Besides that example gives : h = 3, **bounce = 1**, window = 1.5, result is -1 where you can see that the condition on bounce is not fulfilled hence -1

I felt exactly the same when I was working on this Kata - never thought those "conditions" are not range of input.

Think this could be improved by giving a more explicit explaination like "validatation of those input to see if they fulfill the conditions are necessary".

It seams to me description was written by 5yo girl with some serious brain damage.

JS Version of Kata could do with random tests, keep that in mind next time :)