Ad
  • Custom User Avatar

    Please unpublish it, or you'll receive more downvotes. :D

  • Custom User Avatar

    You should provide more test cases. On the other side, as others have pointed out, there are too many Fibonacci katas.

  • Custom User Avatar

    Insufficient fixed testing. Insufficient (cq. none) random testing.

  • Custom User Avatar

    No. Please just unpublish it.

    If you get a really great idea how to make a truly different Fibonacci kata, you can always just create a new one then.

    Honestly, I'd be the first to congratulate you on doing that. Considering the sheer number of existing Fibonacci kata, thinking of something truly new in this field is about worthy of a Nobel Prize. (Well, an IgNobel at least.)

  • Custom User Avatar

    No random tests. Insufficient fixed tests. Disconventional function naming. Double of a thousand existing kata.

    Not much satisfied, sorry. Please try again. (Please don't try to fix this kata. It's not worth it.)

  • Custom User Avatar

    No random tests. Insufficient fixed tests. Disconventional function naming. Double of Collision Detection: Circle-Circle.

    Not much satisfied, sorry. Please try again. (Please don't try to fix this kata. It's not worth it.)

  • Custom User Avatar

    Again the same... no new ideas?
    Marked it as issue... too many fibonacci katas...

  • Custom User Avatar

    Perhaps you can change some things to make it different to the others, so "Draft" and a little bit work;-)?

  • Custom User Avatar

    Yeah.. i think its my bad
    Im publishing a similar but harder kata and thought I could publish a primer to it

    anyway should I unpublish this one?

  • Custom User Avatar

    It's a duplicate, search for "fibonacci" and you will find many similar and same katas...
    Like: https://www.codewars.com/kata/fast-fibonacci