Approved fork

Approved

as usually. it's difficult to make intresting task, so people trying to make more mysterious task, but as was mentioned in other Kata, trying to understand what people really want you to do, is part of the job) so from that perspective good kata) remember 7 red lines)

I agree. True OOP work.

Sample tests are wrong, change Test.assertEquals for assert.strictEqual to fix them.

On Codewars, 8 kyu means "beginner level" and 1 kyu means "proficient level". So if you'd like to challenge yourself, feel free to give those 1 kyus a try ;-)

My solution passed because I was looking to find the wording for the error message when the value for color or flavor was wrong.

Approved!

Thanks!

I feel you man... i wasn't expecting to spend as much time as i did on this task...

No problem. Search about "shallow copy" and "deep copy" in Python and you'll find everything you need to understand how it works.

The problem is that reference solution operates on the list after you modified it (I've just raised an issue about that). With just making a shallow copy of the input your code passes (you are not doing it currently, no_sides is just another pointer to the same object).

Thanks. A few examples (even just one actually) are enough if they reveal a problem. I don't have time to check it now, but, once again, if there is an issue it should be raised as such and the kata should not be approved without fixing it.

Please provide clear examples, with logs, etc. If it is true then it should be raised as an issue, which would (legitimately) prevent the kata from being approvable.