Assumes all numbers are in range, returns error for if not.

this must be the guy who made chatgpt

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/python-list-comprehensions-vs-generator-expressions/

??

Here I thought I was being clever... and completely overlooked the simpler solution.

As little-voted as it is right now for best practice, I ran some benchmarks on BenchmarkDotNet out of curiosity and multiplying a number with itself is magnitudes faster than using Pow(n, 2). This is the one

BenchmarkDotNet=v0.13.2, OS=Windows 11 (10.0.22621.819)
AMD Ryzen 5 Microsoft Surface Edition, 1 CPU, 12 logical and 6 physical cores
.NET SDK=7.0.100
  [Host]     : .NET 6.0.11 (6.0.1122.52304), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
  DefaultJob : .NET 6.0.11 (6.0.1122.52304), X64 RyuJIT AVX2

This produces the character for every single element of inp. Kind of slow?

this is a good one

Think of it as any method that returns either a 1 or a 0. The implementation of it in this case is arbitrary since it is implemented by the caller and not within the method that is being tested.

nice :)))

Wouldn't a set be technically faster to check membership than a string, because it's implimented using a hash table (in Python)? e.g. {'a', 'e', 'i', 'o', 'u'}

good logic...please tell me for have good logic thanks ^_^

I forgot you could do this:

public constructor(public length: number, public width: number, public height: number) { }

This is a trick using something called "parameter properties". You can read about them here: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/classes.html

"Parameter properties are declared by prefixing a constructor parameter with an accessibility modifier or readonly, or both. Using private for a parameter property declares and initializes a private member; likewise, the same is done for public, protected, and readonly."

I think Ship constructor shouldn't have implementation of it how worthIt is calculated.