Not an issue~~

Hi joshpitzalis,

fixed.

1. Function name in initial setup solution incorrect (should be sum instead of somar)
2. Second example test case incorrect
3. Needs random test cases

somar instead of sum in the default code and teh test case says 10 + 20 = 50, which is wrong.

Any luck with this? have the same problem.

...but 3.54 is rounded to 2 decimals and does not end with zero.

I liked it. Instructions made sense. I guess for real beginners, they would know to wrap the given array in the function. But thats part of the learning!

What is a "lost number"? I'm guessing it has something to do with the show I've never seen, and they are not numbers that took a wrong turn on their way to the number line, but I was quite confused at first.

Why are there 300 test cases?

need more test cases and a proper function declaration

Instructions unclear. State that global variable (lost numbers) are to be evaluated by function, or add lost numbers array as argument to function.

I think the description should state more clearly that the var given in the kata should be a global var that the function should search inside of

Instructions are a little unclear

The instructions are still rather vague. As the kata is fairly simple, it isn't much of an issue.

Could do with a better explanation of what is meant by 'lost number'

basic test results differ from submition test results.